These include the setting in which it is delivered and its content. More specifically, this meta-analysis examines specific features of psychoeducation that may contribute to its effectiveness. The aim of this meta-analysis is to integrate the results of studies evaluating the effectiveness of passive psychoeducational interventions in reducing depression, anxiety or psychological distress compared to no intervention, attention-placebo (for example, a thank you letter or telephone calls informing about the well-being of subjects) or waitlist.
However, with the exception of a review of the efficacy of psychoeducational interventions (personalized feedback) for problem drinking, these previous reviews have focused on active rather than passive psychoeducational interventions for mental disorders. In addition, there is some evidence from systematic reviews that psychoeducational interventions are effective (for example, ) in treating or preventing mental disorders. Psychoeducational interventions are less expensive, more easily administered and potentially more accessible than conventional pharmacological and psychological interventions. Examples of passive interventions are interventions that offer psychoeducational information about disorders or feedback to individuals based on test results or screening tests. These interventions can vary from the delivery of 'passive' materials such as single leaflets, emails or information websites to active multi-session group-intervention with exercises and therapist-guidance. For the scope of this review, we focus on psychoeducational interventions for psychological disorders. Psychoeducational interventions are interventions in which education is offered to individuals with psychological disorders or physical illnesses. Given the high prevalence and burden associated with these disorders and the existence of treatment barriers, there is a clear need for brief, inexpensive and effective interventions. Several reasons have been proposed to account for the low delivery rate, including the length of waiting lists driven by low workforce numbers, the high costs associated with treatment, perceived social stigma which reduces help seeking or an inability to identify symptoms of depression. Despite the availability of effective treatments (pharmacological as well as psychological ) in reducing symptoms of common mental disorders, only a minority of people receive psychological treatment delivered by a mental health professional. The findings suggest that the quality of psychoeducation may be important.ĭepression and anxiety are frequently seen in clinical practice and are associated with personal suffering, reduced quality of life and high economic costs. They may offer a first-step intervention for those experiencing psychological distress or depression and might serve as an initial intervention in primary care or community models. Brief passive psychoeducation interventions are easy to implement, can be applied immediately and are not expensive. ConclusionsĪlthough it is commonly believed that psychoeducation interventions are ineffective, this meta-analysis revealed that brief passive psychoeducational interventions for depression and psychological distress can reduce symptoms.
Heterogeneity was not significant among the studies ( I 2 = 32.77, Q:4.46 P = 0.22). The pooled standardized-effect size (four studies, four comparisons) for reduced symptoms of depression and psychological distress at post-intervention was d = 0.20 (95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.40 Z = 2.04 P = 0.04 the number needed to treat: 9). Of these, five papers which described four research studies targeting passive psychoeducation for depression and psychological distress met the inclusion criteria. In total, 9010 abstracts were identified.
Comprehensive meta analysis torrent trial#
Papers describing passive psychoeducational interventions for depression, anxiety and psychological distress were included if the research design was a randomized controlled trial and incorporated an attention placebo, no intervention or waitlist comparison group. Additional materials were obtained from reference lists. MethodsĬochrane, PsycInfo and PubMed databases were searched in September 2008. There are no published meta-analyses of the effectiveness of passive psychoeducation in reducing symptoms of depression, anxiety or psychological distress. Given the high prevalence and burden associated with depression and anxiety disorders and the existence of treatment barriers, there is a clear need for brief, inexpensive and effective interventions such as passive psychoeducational interventions.
0 kommentar(er)
